<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Villeneuve Family Portal &#187; Internet Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.villeneuves.com/blog/tag/internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.villeneuves.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Safari for Windows: it just doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.villeneuves.com/blog/2008/01/safari-for-windows-it-just-doesnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.villeneuves.com/blog/2008/01/safari-for-windows-it-just-doesnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.villeneuves.com/2008/01/02/safari-for-windows-it-just-doesnt-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Apple announced it would offer Safari for Windows last June, I was curious to see how the browser would compare to Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer&#8230;so I downloaded it and tried it out. I was quite surprised to find that the browser functioned like an alpha product. It was buggy, slow, and extremely unpleasant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Apple announced it would offer Safari for Windows last June, I was curious to see how the browser would compare to Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer&#8230;so I downloaded it and tried it out. I was quite surprised to find that the browser functioned like an alpha product. It was buggy, slow, and extremely unpleasant to use. I related this experience to a friend of mine who practically worships Apple (yet chooses to live in Microsoft&#8217;s backyard), and I was assured Safari would improve, because it was just the first public beta.</p>
<p>Well, almost seven months later, Safari for Windows is still in &#8220;beta&#8221; (version 3.04) and it&#8217;s just as horrible as the day I first tried it. It boots up slowly, stupidly attempts to mimic the font rendering of its Mac OS X brother, has trouble processing Javascript and can&#8217;t open files in protected folders. (It will return the error <i>Safari can&#8217;t connect to the server</i>). Apple boasts on its website that Safari is &#8220;the fastest web browser on any platform&#8221; stating specifically:</p>
<blockquote><p> Safari loads pages up to 2 times faster than Internet Explorer 7 and up to 1.7 times faster than Firefox 2.</p>
<div class="column last">And it executes JavaScript up to 3 times faster than Internet Explorer 7 and up to 2 times faster than Firefox 2.What does all that mean for you? Less time loading pages and more time enjoying them.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is complete bogus. On my Windows XP SP2 machine, Safari struggles just to <i>render </i>web pages, let alone attempt to best Firefox, Opera, or IE in a speed competition. And it fails to execute Javascript consistently. It&#8217;s not in the same ballpark as the many mature browsers available for Windows.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how Apple achieved the results it brags about in its own testing environment. Maybe there&#8217;s something on my machine that&#8217;s interfering with Safari, but I keep my system in good order, and other non-Microsoft browsers (Opera, Firefox) work well. But regardless, Safari&#8217;s performance in an Apple testing environment is a useless benchmark for end users. What matters is how well the browser works for the user, and that&#8217;s not the measurement the company is using in its marketing.</p>
<p>Even if Safari is improved,  I doubt users of other browsers will switch to it. There&#8217;s no reason for them to do so. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, Mozilla Firefox remains the best browser available &#8211; for Windows, Mac, or Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.villeneuves.com/blog/2008/01/safari-for-windows-it-just-doesnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

